PoliticsBengaluru Urban
Afternoon Pulse: Karnataka leaves quota appeal to Cabinet as protest crackdown stings Congress
The Shivakumar government says its Cabinet will decide whether to fight the High Court's quota ruling in the Supreme Court, while its Home Minister orders a review of police handling of anti-SIR protesters.
Pan India Pulse deskBased on reports from Social News XYZ (IANS), ANI, Business Standard, NewsKarnataka
Since this morning, the Shivakumar government has broken its silence on the High Court ruling that struck down Karnataka's 56 per cent reservation for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. It has not made a decision. Deputy Chief Minister G Parameshwara told reporters in Bengaluru that the Cabinet would decide whether to appeal in the Supreme Court. Meanwhile the government found itself answering a different charge: that its own police roughed up people protesting against the voter-roll revision the Congress itself opposes.
On the quota, Parameshwara said the state would consult the Advocate General and the Law Department before the Cabinet takes a call, IANS and ANI reported. He said the government still had to work out whether the order applies to past decisions or only future ones, and that several recruitments made after the Congress came to power had followed the higher quotas. He called the ruling a serious development for jobs and education. He also offered a personal view that a six-point increase could have been treated as a special case, pointing to Tamil Nadu's 69 per cent. No date for the Cabinet meeting has been officially announced in any report we could verify.
Parameshwara also pushed back at the BJP. He rejected the suggestion that the government could steer the judiciary, saying no one can hold a judge's hand. He asked why the Bommai government passed the law in October 2022 knowing it would cross the 50 per cent line without Ninth Schedule protection, and urged the Centre to review the ceiling and reconsider Karnataka's request to place the quotas in that schedule, Business Standard and NewsKarnataka reported. The Centre had deferred that request while the case was pending, the reports said.
Former Chief Minister Siddaramaiah went further in a statement carried by ANI and Asianet Newsable. He called the verdict a serious setback for marginalised communities and asked whether the BJP had put electoral advantage ahead of lasting social justice when it raised the quotas before the 2023 election. He credited the Justice Nagamohan Das committee, set up under the Congress-JD(S) coalition in 2018, with laying the groundwork, and said the Union government must now explain what constitutional fix it proposes.
What the ruling means for students and job seekers remains unclear. NewsKarnataka reported that admissions and appointments already made have not been automatically cancelled and that the effect will depend on the court's operative directions. The government says it will try to protect ongoing recruitment and admissions. Until the Cabinet meets and the full order is studied, candidates are being told to watch for official notices.
Bommai's challenge from last night, that the BJP would go to the Supreme Court itself if the state did not, drew no direct reply from Chief Minister D K Shivakumar in any report we found by early afternoon.
The second story is closer to home for the ruling party. On Monday afternoon, police detained around 50 to 60 protesters from the My Vote My Right coalition near the Chief Electoral Officer's office in Bengaluru, The South First reported. Protesters alleged excessive force, including hair-pulling and kicking, and journalists said they were pushed and a camera was snatched, according to The South First and The News Minute. Police said the group had gathered without permission, refused to move to Freedom Park, and were held in preventive custody and later released.
On Tuesday, Home Minister Priyank Kharge said the police handling of the protest would be reviewed and that officers had been told not to disrupt peaceful demonstrations, The Bengaluru Live and The Week reported. He also asked protesters to keep the police informed. The Week noted the awkward timing: the detentions came as Rahul and Priyanka Gandhi were leading an anti-SIR protest in Delhi.
The other morning loops did not move. ANI reported no fix yet to the 14 defects the Supreme Court registry flagged in the INDIA bloc's SIR petition, and no listing date. We found no new government step on Kumaraswamy's sting allegations, and the BJP has still not announced dates for its threatened siege of police stations over Form-7 FIRs.
Pulse view
Analysis by the Pulse deskThe day's two stories share an uncomfortable mirror. On reservations, the Congress is blaming the BJP for passing a law it knew might not survive, and blaming the Centre for not shielding it. On the SIR, the Congress is the party in Delhi demanding the right to protest, while its own police in Bengaluru are accused of shoving protesters who agree with it. In both cases the government is being asked to own consequences that it would rather attribute to someone else.
Parameshwara's caution has a logic. An appeal is easy to announce and hard to win when the 50 per cent ceiling has held since 1992, and a rushed filing could raise hopes it cannot meet. But every day of deliberation leaves job seekers and SC/ST families in limbo, and hands the BJP the chance to look more eager to defend its own law than the government that inherited it. Kharge's quick review, for its part, costs little and buys goodwill; whether it produces findings is another matter.
If the Cabinet does go to the Supreme Court, will Karnataka argue that its case is exceptional, or ask the court to rethink the 50 per cent ceiling itself?
What they are saying
The Cabinet will decide on the next course of action.
We will consult them, examine what is legally tenable and then take a decision
Was electoral advantage prioritised over lasting social justice?
In a democracy, peaceful dissent is not a threat to law and order. It is a right that law and order must protect
What to watch
- When the Cabinet meets on the quota ruling and whether it decides to appeal in the Supreme Court
- Whether the government clarifies the status of admissions and recruitment made under the 56 per cent quota
- Whether Bommai or the BJP files its own challenge if the state delays
- What the review of Monday's police action against anti-SIR protesters finds
- Whether the INDIA bloc cures the defects in its SIR petition and gets a listing date
Your take
Do you agree with the Pulse view?
Sources
- Karnataka Cabinet to decide on moving Supreme Court against HC order quashing reservation hike Social News XYZ (IANS)
- Karnataka to discuss approaching Supreme Court against HC verdict striking down law to increase quota for SC/ST ANI
- Karnataka HC rules against SC/ST quota hike, cites 50% reservation cap Business Standard
- Karnataka High Court strikes down SC/ST quota hike NewsKarnataka
- Siddaramaiah questions BJP's handling of SC/ST quota after HC blow Asianet Newsable
- Anti-SIR protesters detained near CEO office in Bengaluru; women allege police excesses The South First
- Bengaluru protesters, journalists detained before march demanding scrapping of SIR The News Minute
- Bengaluru police crackdown on anti-SIR protesters puts Karnataka Congress government in a spot The Week
- Bengaluru Police Protest Handling To Be Reviewed: Kharge The Bengaluru Live
- SC Registry flags 14 defects in Rahul Gandhi, INDIA bloc leaders' plea against ECI ANI