PAN INDIA PULSEभारत की नब्ज़India PulseThe live pulse of Indian politics
Skip to election data

India Lok Sabha election 2014

CHELVELLA election result 2014

KONDA VISHWESHWAR REDDY · TRS. A complete candidate-level record from the cited dataset.

Winning margin
73,023
Votes ahead of runner-up
Margin share
5.6%
Candidate votes; excludes NOTA
Winner’s share
33.3%
Candidate votes; excludes NOTA
Electoral competition
3.78
Effective number of electoral parties
Turnout
—
Requires votes cast and registered electors
Winner / all electors
—
Registered-elector denominator

Every candidate, every vote

CandidatePartyVotesCandidate-vote share
KONDA VISHWESHWAR REDDYTRS435,07733.3%
PATLOLLA KARTIK REDDYINC362,05427.7%
TULLA VEERENDERTDP353,20327.0%
CHAN PASHAAkhil Bharatiya Muslim League (Secular)56,8354.4%
KONDA RAGHAVA REDDYYSRCP40,1353.1%
G.MALLESHAM GOUDIND24,6601.9%
SAMALA RAVINDARBSP7,7320.6%
REGATTE VENKAT REDDYAAP7,4620.6%
KUMMARI GIRIPyramid Party of India5,7890.4%
MD YUNUS MIYAMarxist Communist Party of India (United)2,9040.2%
DR. P. SADHU SATYANADHANIndian Christian Secular Party2,5450.2%
SUTHARAPU PADMAIAHAndhra Pradesh Rashtra Samaikya Samithi Party2,2140.2%
SANIKE RAM GOPAL YADAVIND2,0580.2%
DR.GOLLA RAMAIAHTelangana Loksatta Party1,7650.1%
SYED HASHMATHULLAH QUADRIIndian Union Muslim League1,4110.1%

NOTA: 10,018. NOTA is excluded from candidate-share and competition calculations.

What the result can tell you

The winning margin was 73,023 votes. These are aggregate election results. They do not identify how individual voters changed their votes or explain why a party won.

Definitions, denominators and comparison limits

Evidence & dataset version

ECI candidate-wise results preserved by DataMeet. Archived results are reproduced with provenance; NOTA is separate. Current official statutory returns take precedence.

Dataset 2026-10-27T00:59:40+05:30 · calculation 1.0.0 · boundary pc-national-2008.

Download all candidate records for this election (CSV)
← Back to election map and all constituencies
Request a comparative brief →