PAN INDIA PULSEभारत की नब्ज़India PulseThe live pulse of Indian politics
Skip to election data

India Lok Sabha election 2014

SARGUJA election result 2014

KAMALBHAN SINGH MARABI · BJP. A complete candidate-level record from the cited dataset.

Winning margin
147,236
Votes ahead of runner-up
Margin share
12.7%
Candidate votes; excludes NOTA
Winner’s share
50.6%
Candidate votes; excludes NOTA
Electoral competition
2.49
Effective number of electoral parties
Turnout
—
Requires votes cast and registered electors
Winner / all electors
—
Registered-elector denominator

Every candidate, every vote

CandidatePartyVotesCandidate-vote share
KAMALBHAN SINGH MARABIBJP585,33650.6%
RAM DEV RAMINC438,10037.9%
DHARMJEET SINGH MARKAMBSP21,6331.9%
RAJNATHIND15,5151.3%
COMRADE SURENDRA LAL SINGHCommunist Party of India (Marxist)14,8491.3%
BALDEO PRASAD SINGH MARAVIGondvana Gantantra Party14,7021.3%
RAMASAPNA SINGHAmbedkarite Party of India11,6911.0%
TULESHWAR SINGHAITC11,3841.0%
BAHADUR RAMIND10,8610.9%
DUBRAJ SINGH MARKAMIND7,5770.7%
SHIVKUMAR SINGH SHYAMRashtriya Gondvana Party7,3740.6%
KUMAIT RAM SANDILIND6,1460.5%
RAMNATH CHEARWAShoshit Samaj Dal6,0510.5%
ADVOCATE KUNJ BIHARI SINGH PAIKRABahujan Mukti Party4,9980.4%

NOTA: 31,104. NOTA is excluded from candidate-share and competition calculations.

Constituency history

ElectionComparabilityWinning party
2019 resultSame recorded boundary versionBJP

What the result can tell you

The winning margin was 147,236 votes. These are aggregate election results. They do not identify how individual voters changed their votes or explain why a party won.

Definitions, denominators and comparison limits

Evidence & dataset version

ECI candidate-wise results preserved by DataMeet. Archived results are reproduced with provenance; NOTA is separate. Current official statutory returns take precedence.

Dataset 2026-10-27T00:59:40+05:30 · calculation 1.0.0 · boundary pc-national-2008.

Download all candidate records for this election (CSV)
← Back to election map and all constituencies
Request a comparative brief →