PAN INDIA PULSEभारत की नब्ज़India PulseThe live pulse of Indian politics
Skip to election data

India Lok Sabha election 2014

Bijapur election result 2014

RAMESH JIGAJINAGI · BJP. A complete candidate-level record from the cited dataset.

Winning margin
69,819
Votes ahead of runner-up
Margin share
7.3%
Candidate votes; excludes NOTA
Winner’s share
49.2%
Candidate votes; excludes NOTA
Electoral competition
2.37
Effective number of electoral parties
Turnout
—
Requires votes cast and registered electors
Winner / all electors
—
Registered-elector denominator

Every candidate, every vote

CandidatePartyVotesCandidate-vote share
RAMESH JIGAJINAGIBJP471,75749.2%
PRAKASH RATHODINC401,93841.9%
K SHIVRAMJanata Dal (Secular)57,5516.0%
SHRIDHAR NARAYANKARAAP4,7170.5%
HUNNUR MARAGANNA MALAPPAIND3,7950.4%
SUDHAKAR KANAMADIBSP2,8180.3%
HANMANT MOTHER-BASALINGAVVA HOLERIND2,7750.3%
SIDDAPPA B GANJIIND2,6910.3%
RUDRESH DAYAPPA DODAMANIIND2,2590.2%
SATISH ASANGIHALIND2,1940.2%
SHRIKANT DEVENDRAPPA ARAKERIKarunaadu Party1,9300.2%
RAJU SHRIMANT PADAGANURIND1,4220.1%
BHAGWAN DHARMANNA KAMBALERepublican Party of India (A)1,3400.1%
RAVI (RAJESH) Y VALLYAPURIND1,2830.1%

NOTA: 8,287. NOTA is excluded from candidate-share and competition calculations.

Constituency history

ElectionComparabilityWinning party
2024 resultDifferent boundary / not directly comparableBJP
2019 resultSame recorded boundary versionBJP

What the result can tell you

The winning margin was 69,819 votes. These are aggregate election results. They do not identify how individual voters changed their votes or explain why a party won.

Definitions, denominators and comparison limits

Evidence & dataset version

ECI candidate-wise results preserved by DataMeet. Archived results are reproduced with provenance; NOTA is separate. Current official statutory returns take precedence.

Dataset 2026-10-27T00:59:40+05:30 · calculation 1.0.0 · boundary pc-national-2008.

Download all candidate records for this election (CSV)
← Back to election map and all constituencies
Request a comparative brief →