PAN INDIA PULSEभारत की नब्ज़India PulseThe live pulse of Indian politics
Skip to election data

India Lok Sabha election 2014

Firozabad election result 2014

AKSHAY YADAV · SP. A complete candidate-level record from the cited dataset.

Winning margin
114,059
Votes ahead of runner-up
Margin share
10.4%
Candidate votes; excludes NOTA
Winner’s share
48.6%
Candidate votes; excludes NOTA
Electoral competition
2.54
Effective number of electoral parties
Turnout
—
Requires votes cast and registered electors
Winner / all electors
—
Registered-elector denominator

Every candidate, every vote

CandidatePartyVotesCandidate-vote share
AKSHAY YADAVSP534,58348.6%
PROF. S.P. SINGH BAGHELBJP420,52438.2%
TH. VISHWADEEP SINGHBSP118,90910.8%
ATUL CHATURVEDIINC7,4470.7%
UPENDRA SINGHBharatiya Kisan Parivartan Party3,6960.3%
SHAMSHER KHAPeace Party3,5260.3%
RAKESH YADAVAAP2,8080.3%
RAJVEERIND2,4250.2%
MIRJA MUKARRAM BAIGIND1,4700.1%
JAY PRAKASHShivsena1,2480.1%
LAKSHMI NARAYANRashtriya Janwadi Party (Krantikari)9390.1%
KHAJAN SINGHLok Dal7530.1%
LAXMIBhartiya Shakti Chetna Party6200.1%
RAJENDRA PRASADBahujan Mukti Party5060.0%
RAHAT AFROZIndian Union Muslim League4980.0%

NOTA: 4,654. NOTA is excluded from candidate-share and competition calculations.

Constituency history

ElectionComparabilityWinning party
2024 resultDifferent boundary / not directly comparableSP
2019 resultSame recorded boundary versionBJP

What the result can tell you

The winning margin was 114,059 votes. These are aggregate election results. They do not identify how individual voters changed their votes or explain why a party won.

Definitions, denominators and comparison limits

Evidence & dataset version

ECI candidate-wise results preserved by DataMeet. Archived results are reproduced with provenance; NOTA is separate. Current official statutory returns take precedence.

Dataset 2026-10-27T00:59:40+05:30 · calculation 1.0.0 · boundary pc-national-2008.

Download all candidate records for this election (CSV)
← Back to election map and all constituencies
Request a comparative brief →