PAN INDIA PULSEभारत की नब्ज़India PulseThe live pulse of Indian politics
Skip to election data

India Lok Sabha election 2014

Machhlishahr election result 2014

RAM CHARITRA NISHAD · BJP. A complete candidate-level record from the cited dataset.

Winning margin
172,155
Votes ahead of runner-up
Margin share
17.4%
Candidate votes; excludes NOTA
Winner’s share
44.3%
Candidate votes; excludes NOTA
Electoral competition
3.25
Effective number of electoral parties
Turnout
—
Requires votes cast and registered electors
Winner / all electors
—
Registered-elector denominator

Every candidate, every vote

CandidatePartyVotesCandidate-vote share
RAM CHARITRA NISHADBJP438,21044.3%
BHOLANATH ALIAS B.P. SAROJBSP266,05526.9%
TUFANISP191,38719.3%
TUFANI NISHADINC36,2753.7%
SUBAS CHANDRACPI18,7771.9%
RAJ ALIAS VIRENDRA KUMAR SONKARAAP9,2230.9%
SHRAVAN KUMAR PASWANIND7,8330.8%
HARINATHIND5,2790.5%
RAJESH SONKARIND4,3620.4%
OMPRAKASH ALIAS AMBEDKARIND2,7080.3%
HARISuheldev Bhartiya Samaj Party2,6690.3%
SIKANDARBahujan Mukti Party2,1140.2%
RAJESHJanata Dal (United)1,5520.2%
LALJIBhartiya Shakti Chetna Party1,5430.2%
SURESH GAUTAMAdarsh Rashtriya Vikas Party1,4670.1%

NOTA: 8,448. NOTA is excluded from candidate-share and competition calculations.

Constituency history

ElectionComparabilityWinning party
2024 resultDifferent boundary / not directly comparableSP
2019 resultSame recorded boundary versionBJP

What the result can tell you

The winning margin was 172,155 votes. These are aggregate election results. They do not identify how individual voters changed their votes or explain why a party won.

Definitions, denominators and comparison limits

Evidence & dataset version

ECI candidate-wise results preserved by DataMeet. Archived results are reproduced with provenance; NOTA is separate. Current official statutory returns take precedence.

Dataset 2026-10-27T00:59:40+05:30 · calculation 1.0.0 · boundary pc-national-2008.

Download all candidate records for this election (CSV)
← Back to election map and all constituencies
Request a comparative brief →