India Lok Sabha election 2014
Maharajganj election result 2014
PANKAJ · BJP. A complete candidate-level record from the cited dataset.
- Winning margin
- 240,458 Votes ahead of runner-up
- Margin share
- 22.9% Candidate votes; excludes NOTA
- Winner’s share
- 44.8% Candidate votes; excludes NOTA
- Electoral competition
- 3.40 Effective number of electoral parties
- Turnout
- — Requires votes cast and registered electors
- Winner / all electors
- — Registered-elector denominator
Every candidate, every vote
| Candidate | Party | Votes | Candidate-vote share |
|---|---|---|---|
| PANKAJ | BJP | 471,542 | 44.8% |
| KASHI NATH SHUKLA | BSP | 231,084 | 22.0% |
| AKHILESH | SP | 213,974 | 20.3% |
| HARSH VARDHAN | INC | 57,193 | 5.4% |
| ANIL KUMAR SHAHANI | IND | 15,517 | 1.5% |
| TEJ PRATAP | IND | 6,131 | 0.6% |
| SHREE AKHILESH KUMAR | Apna Dal United Party | 5,422 | 0.5% |
| KAVILAS | Suheldev Bhartiya Samaj Party | 5,195 | 0.5% |
| RAMSAMUJH | Swaraj (J) | 5,001 | 0.5% |
| GOVIND DAS | IND | 4,216 | 0.4% |
| DAYARAM NISHAD | IND | 4,210 | 0.4% |
| AJAYDHAR | IND | 4,079 | 0.4% |
| ARAT KHARVAR | Bahujan Mukti Party | 3,752 | 0.4% |
| MUMMATAJ | Peace Party | 3,582 | 0.3% |
| SHIVCHARAN | Jai Hind Samaj Party | 3,455 | 0.3% |
| PASHUPATI NATH GUPTA | AAP | 3,196 | 0.3% |
| RAKESH KUMAR GIRI | IND | 2,545 | 0.2% |
| VIMLESH TRIPATHI | Naitik Party | 2,339 | 0.2% |
| DINANATH | IND | 2,149 | 0.2% |
| RADHEYSHYAM | Most Backward Classes Of India | 1,961 | 0.2% |
| RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA | IND | 1,828 | 0.2% |
| DINESH KUMAR | IND | 1,671 | 0.2% |
| MANGAL LAL | Lok Dal | 1,491 | 0.1% |
No matching records. Clear the search to see the full table.
NOTA: 4,545. NOTA is excluded from candidate-share and competition calculations.
Constituency history
| Election | Comparability | Winning party |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 result | Different boundary / not directly comparable | BJP |
| 2019 result | Same recorded boundary version | BJP |
No matching records. Clear the search to see the full table.
What the result can tell you
The winning margin was 240,458 votes. These are aggregate election results. They do not identify how individual voters changed their votes or explain why a party won.
Definitions, denominators and comparison limitsEvidence & dataset version
ECI candidate-wise results preserved by DataMeet. Archived results are reproduced with provenance; NOTA is separate. Current official statutory returns take precedence.
Dataset 2026-10-27T00:59:40+05:30 · calculation 1.0.0 · boundary pc-national-2008.
- 2014 ECI candidate-wise results, archived CSV DataMeet / ECI · community