PAN INDIA PULSEभारत की नब्ज़India PulseThe live pulse of Indian politics
Skip to election data

India Lok Sabha election 2014

Phulpur election result 2014

KESHAV PRASAD MAURYA · BJP. A complete candidate-level record from the cited dataset.

Winning margin
308,308
Votes ahead of runner-up
Margin share
32.4%
Candidate votes; excludes NOTA
Winner’s share
52.9%
Candidate votes; excludes NOTA
Electoral competition
2.81
Effective number of electoral parties
Turnout
—
Requires votes cast and registered electors
Winner / all electors
—
Registered-elector denominator

Every candidate, every vote

CandidatePartyVotesCandidate-vote share
KESHAV PRASAD MAURYABJP503,56452.9%
DHARAM RAJ SINGH PATELSP195,25620.5%
KAPIL MUNI KARWARIYABSP163,71017.2%
MOHD. KAIFINC58,1276.1%
SHIMALA SHRIAAP7,3840.8%
MILAN MUKERJEEIND5,6520.6%
ZIAOUL HAQUEIND3,3920.4%
MITHILESH KUMARIND3,1140.3%
GYANENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA (GYANI BHAI)NCP2,7060.3%
DR. NEERAJIND2,1870.2%
SURENDRA KUMAR MISHRALok Dal1,5850.2%
GANESHJI TRIPATHIRashtriya Bandhutwa Party1,5210.2%
NATHU RAM BOUDHABahujan Mukti Party1,3060.1%
PARVEZ ASHFAQUE SIDDIQUIQaumi Ekta Dal1,3020.1%
DAKKHINI PRASAD KUSHWAHARashtriya Garib Dal1,1110.1%

NOTA: 8,424. NOTA is excluded from candidate-share and competition calculations.

Constituency history

ElectionComparabilityWinning party
2024 resultDifferent boundary / not directly comparableBJP
2019 resultSame recorded boundary versionBJP

What the result can tell you

The winning margin was 308,308 votes. These are aggregate election results. They do not identify how individual voters changed their votes or explain why a party won.

Definitions, denominators and comparison limits

Evidence & dataset version

ECI candidate-wise results preserved by DataMeet. Archived results are reproduced with provenance; NOTA is separate. Current official statutory returns take precedence.

Dataset 2026-10-27T00:59:40+05:30 · calculation 1.0.0 · boundary pc-national-2008.

Download all candidate records for this election (CSV)
← Back to election map and all constituencies
Request a comparative brief →