PAN INDIA PULSEभारत की नब्ज़India PulseThe live pulse of Indian politics
Skip to election data

India Lok Sabha election 2014

Salempur election result 2014

RAVINDRA KUSHAWAHA · BJP. A complete candidate-level record from the cited dataset.

Winning margin
232,342
Votes ahead of runner-up
Margin share
27.4%
Candidate votes; excludes NOTA
Winner’s share
46.3%
Candidate votes; excludes NOTA
Electoral competition
3.39
Effective number of electoral parties
Turnout
—
Requires votes cast and registered electors
Winner / all electors
—
Registered-elector denominator

Every candidate, every vote

CandidatePartyVotesCandidate-vote share
RAVINDRA KUSHAWAHABJP392,21346.3%
RAVI SHANKER SINGH"PAPPU"BSP159,87118.9%
HARIBANSH SAHAI KUSHWAHASP159,68818.9%
OM PRAKASH RAJBHARSuheldev Bhartiya Samaj Party66,0847.8%
DR.BHOLA PANDEYINC41,8904.9%
ONKAR SINGHSamajwadi Samaj Party4,9470.6%
RAM KRIPALIND4,3770.5%
CHANDRA PRATAP SINGHAAP4,2630.5%
SUSHANT RAJ PATHAKIND3,6310.4%
SHRIRAM CHAUDHARYCommunist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) (Liberation)3,5720.4%
SIYARAM DASIND2,7090.3%
DR SANJAY KR. SINGHJanata Dal (United)1,6750.2%
FIROZ AKHTARRashtriya Ulama Council1,5070.2%

NOTA: 8,322. NOTA is excluded from candidate-share and competition calculations.

Constituency history

ElectionComparabilityWinning party
2024 resultDifferent boundary / not directly comparableSP
2019 resultSame recorded boundary versionBJP

What the result can tell you

The winning margin was 232,342 votes. These are aggregate election results. They do not identify how individual voters changed their votes or explain why a party won.

Definitions, denominators and comparison limits

Evidence & dataset version

ECI candidate-wise results preserved by DataMeet. Archived results are reproduced with provenance; NOTA is separate. Current official statutory returns take precedence.

Dataset 2026-10-27T00:59:40+05:30 · calculation 1.0.0 · boundary pc-national-2008.

Download all candidate records for this election (CSV)
← Back to election map and all constituencies
Request a comparative brief →