PAN INDIA PULSEभारत की नब्ज़India PulseThe live pulse of Indian politics
Skip to election data

India Lok Sabha election 2019

Gulbarga election result 2019

DR. UMESH G JADHAV · BJP. A complete candidate-level record from the cited dataset.

Winning margin
95,452
Votes ahead of runner-up
Margin share
8.1%
Candidate votes; excludes NOTA
Winner’s share
52.6%
Candidate votes; excludes NOTA
Electoral competition
2.11
Effective number of electoral parties
Turnout
—
Requires votes cast and registered electors
Winner / all electors
—
Registered-elector denominator

Every candidate, every vote

CandidatePartyVotesCandidate-vote share
DR. UMESH G JADHAVBJP620,19252.6%
MALLIKARJUN KHARGEINC524,74044.5%
K. B. VASUBSP10,8650.9%
VIJAY JADHAVSJP6,5070.6%
RAMESH BHEEMSINGH CHAVANIND5,0560.4%
S. M. SHARMASUCI(C)2,2490.2%
DR. M. P. DARAKESHWARAIAHIND2,0360.2%
MAHESH LAMBANIUPP1,7830.2%
SHANKAR JADHAVBPP1,6490.1%
D. K. KONKATE KEROORRSP1,4850.1%
G. TIMMARAJUIND1,3610.1%
RAJKUMARBBKD9510.1%

NOTA: 10,487. NOTA is excluded from candidate-share and competition calculations.

Constituency history

ElectionComparabilityWinning party
2014 resultSame recorded boundary versionINC
2024 resultDifferent boundary / not directly comparableINC

What the result can tell you

The winning margin was 95,452 votes. These are aggregate election results. They do not identify how individual voters changed their votes or explain why a party won.

Definitions, denominators and comparison limits

Evidence & dataset version

ECI-derived candidate records from the CC0 Indian Elections Data archive. The archive electorate field is unreliable and is intentionally not used; turnout is unavailable. Source coverage is explicit and these are not certified statutory returns. This archive contains 541 of 543 constituency results; party wins shown are dataset counts, not the full official tally.

Dataset 2026-10-27T00:59:40+05:30 · calculation 1.0.0 · boundary pc-national-2008.

Download all candidate records for this election (CSV)
← Back to election map and all constituencies
Request a comparative brief →