PAN INDIA PULSEతెలంగాణ నాడిTelangana PulseThe live pulse of Telangana politics
Skip to election data

Telangana Assembly election 2014

Medak election result 2014

M.PADMA DEVENDER REDDY · TRS. A complete candidate-level record from the cited dataset.

Winning margin
39,600
Votes ahead of runner-up
Margin share
25.3%
Candidate votes; excludes NOTA
Winner’s share
57.2%
Candidate votes; excludes NOTA
Electoral competition
2.31
Effective number of electoral parties
Turnout
—
Requires votes cast and registered electors
Winner / all electors
—
Registered-elector denominator

Every candidate, every vote

CandidatePartyVotesCandidate-vote share
M.PADMA DEVENDER REDDYTRS89,65457.2%
VIJAYA SHANTHI. MINC50,05431.9%
BATTI JAGAPATHITDP9,2815.9%
POGAKU ASHOK KUMARIND3,2402.1%
SIDDIRAMULUBSP1,1890.8%
C.SHOBHARANIPPOI9330.6%
PAKALA SRIHARI RAOIND7980.5%
DORBALA GUNAKER SHARMAIND4740.3%
ALLARAM KRISTU DASSYSRCP4650.3%
M.D. ABDUL HALEEM QURAISHITMOR3200.2%
NOORBHASHA.M.E.RAHEEMRLD2820.2%

NOTA: 1,602. NOTA is excluded from candidate-share and competition calculations.

Constituency history

ElectionComparabilityWinning party
2018 resultDifferent boundary / not directly comparableTRS
2023 resultDifferent boundary / not directly comparableINC

What the result can tell you

The winning margin was 39,600 votes. These are aggregate election results. They do not identify how individual voters changed their votes or explain why a party won.

Definitions, denominators and comparison limits

Evidence & dataset version

ECI-derived candidate records republished in the MIT-licensed Assembly Results Archive. Original numbering is retained in provenance; AP 2014/2019 legacy numbers are matched to current seats. Not independently certified statutory returns. Direct comparisons across state reorganisation are disabled pending an official boundary crosswalk.

Dataset 2026-10-27T00:59:40+05:30 · calculation 1.0.0 · boundary ac-telangana-2008.

Download all candidate records for this election (CSV)
← Back to election map and all constituencies
Request a comparative brief →