PAN INDIA PULSEఆంధ్ర నాడిAndhra PulseThe live pulse of Andhra politics
Skip to research

Andhra Pradesh / Local elections 2026

Local democracy.
Across Andhra Pradesh.

Turnout, places & the ballot.

Participation, competition and the patterns beneath a statewide headline. Every figure has a scope. Every conclusion has a limit.

Urban local electionsReviewed 2 November 2026Non-partisan analysis

AI-assisted Pulse desk analysis. The latest reported polling-day total is distinguished from the preserved 3 PM and around-5-PM snapshots. Open the live centre for subsequent reports.

Notified urban bodies
100
92 held polling; 8 fully unopposed
Reported wards
3,942
3,186 contested / 756 unopposed
Unopposed ward share
19.18%
756 ÷ 3,942 · reported, not audited returns
Same-time body coverage
27/100
3 PM media observations in this edition

Election structure: The New Indian Express ↗. The 100-body denominator is the notified universe, including fully unopposed bodies; it is not a count of bodies that polled.

Explore locallyFind a city or townCompare participationThe Tirupati contrastUnderstand the processWho elects whom?

The observation is not the publication time

One polling day. Two different readings.

Interim and later reported Andhra turnout48.03 percent at 3 PM on November 1; 60.96 percent reported on November 2 for the polling day. Both published counts use an electorate of 9,689,061. No exact closing observation time is invented.3 PM observation · 1 NovPolling-day total · reported 2 Nov48.03%60.96%0%50%100%48.03% at 3 PM; 60.96% later reported polling-day total3 PM · 1 NovemberPolling-day total · reported 2 Nov48.03%60.96%0%50%100%

Shared published electorate: 9,689,061. These are separate reported snapshots, not a smoothed trend or a forecast. A polling-day total has no invented 5 PM timestamp. The later report’s 3,453-ward scope differs from the earlier 3,186 contested-ward figure; that difference remains unresolved.

Coverage before comparison

Find your city or town.

The retained site register covers 100 notified bodies across 26 reported district groupings and 3,942 wards. Twenty-three later-poll urban bodies are excluded. Directory completeness does not establish turnout completeness or official boundary certification. No ward-level turnout observations have been verified for this edition: 0 / 3,942.

Inspect all 26 district coverage summaries

District totals require matching votes cast and eligible voters. An unweighted average of body percentages is not a district turnout.

Retained directory, checked 31 Oct 2026; 3 PM reporting coverage
District groupingNotified bodiesWard directoryBody reportsDistrict turnout
Anakapalli2720 / 2—
Ananthapuramu62620 / 6—
Annamayya2920 / 2—
Bapatla2800 / 2—
Chittoor52040 / 5—
Dr B R Ambedkar Konaseema3910 / 3—
East Godavari3960 / 3—
Eluru31302 / 3—
Guntur21281 / 2—
Kakinada61916 / 6—
Krishna31200 / 3—
Kurnool41872 / 4—
Markapuram31001 / 3—
NTR52225 / 5—
Nandyal62120 / 6—
Palnadu72470 / 7—
Parvathipuram Manyam3960 / 3—
Prakasam41501 / 4—
Sri Potti Sreeramulu Nellore31281 / 3—
Sri Sathya Sai62180 / 6—
Srikakulam2640 / 2—
Tirupati52025 / 5—
Visakhapatnam11201 / 1—
Vizianagaram31210 / 3—
West Godavari2641 / 2—
Y S R Kadapa93451 / 9—
Browse the urban directory100 bodies · filter by district or town

100 bodies

1 November 2026 · observation times in IST · provisional percentages
Urban body / districtWards3 PMAround 5 PM
Narsipatnam MunicipalityAnakapalli40Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Yelamanchili MunicipalityAnakapalli32Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Anantapur Municipal CorporationAnanthapuramu62Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Gooty MunicipalityAnanthapuramu32Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Guntakal MunicipalityAnanthapuramu48Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Kalyandurg MunicipalityAnanthapuramu32Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Rayadurg MunicipalityAnanthapuramu40Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Tadipatri MunicipalityAnanthapuramu48Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Madanapalle MunicipalityAnnamayya48Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Rayachoti MunicipalityAnnamayya44Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Chirala MunicipalityBapatla44Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Repalle MunicipalityBapatla36Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Chittoor Municipal CorporationChittoor60Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Kuppam MunicipalityChittoor32Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Nagari MunicipalityChittoor40Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Palamaner MunicipalityChittoor36Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Punganur MunicipalityChittoor36Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Amalapuram MunicipalityDr B R Ambedkar Konaseema36Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Mummidivaram Nagar PanchayatDr B R Ambedkar Konaseema23Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Ramachandrapuram MunicipalityDr B R Ambedkar Konaseema32Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Kovvur MunicipalityEast Godavari28Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Mandapeta MunicipalityEast Godavari36Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Nidadavolu MunicipalityEast Godavari32Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Eluru Municipal CorporationEluru6243.84% The Hans India ↗Awaiting verified report
Jangareddygudem MunicipalityEluru3254.28% The Hans India ↗Awaiting verified report
Nuzvid MunicipalityEluru36Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Guntur Municipal CorporationGuntur7640.99% The Hans India ↗Awaiting verified report
Tenali MunicipalityGuntur52Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Gollaprolu MunicipalityKakinada2363.55% NTV Telugu ↗Awaiting verified report
Peddapuram MunicipalityKakinada3257.02% NTV Telugu ↗Awaiting verified report
Pithapuram MunicipalityKakinada3663.16% NTV Telugu ↗Awaiting verified report
Samalkot MunicipalityKakinada3658.00% NTV Telugu ↗Awaiting verified report
Tuni MunicipalityKakinada3655.95% NTV Telugu ↗Awaiting verified report
Yeleswaram MunicipalityKakinada2861.22% NTV Telugu ↗Awaiting verified report
Machilipatnam Municipal CorporationKrishna60Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Pedana MunicipalityKrishna28Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Vuyyuru MunicipalityKrishna32Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Adoni MunicipalityKurnool5240.11% The Hans India ↗Awaiting verified report
Gudur Nagar Panchayat (Kurnool)Kurnool2373.96% The Hans India ↗Awaiting verified report
Kurnool Municipal CorporationKurnool68Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Yemmiganur MunicipalityKurnool44Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Giddalur MunicipalityMarkapuram28Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Kanigiri MunicipalityMarkapuram3273.20% The Hans India ↗Awaiting verified report
Markapur MunicipalityMarkapuram40Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Jaggayyapeta MunicipalityNTR3658.25% NTV Telugu ↗Awaiting verified report
Kondapalli MunicipalityNTR4059.03% NTV Telugu ↗Awaiting verified report
Nandigama MunicipalityNTR3262.39% NTV Telugu ↗Awaiting verified report
Tiruvuru MunicipalityNTR2861.25% NTV Telugu ↗Awaiting verified report
Vijayawada Municipal CorporationNTR8641.80% The Hans India ↗Awaiting verified report
Allagadda MunicipalityNandyal32Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Atmakur Municipality (Kurnool)Nandyal32Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Betamcherla Nagar PanchayatNandyal28Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Dhone MunicipalityNandyal36Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Nandikotkur MunicipalityNandyal32Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Nandyal MunicipalityNandyal52Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Chilakaluripet MunicipalityPalnadu48Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Dachepalli Nagar PanchayatPalnadu28Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Gurazala Nagar PanchayatPalnadu23Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Macherla MunicipalityPalnadu36Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Piduguralla MunicipalityPalnadu40Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Sattenapalle MunicipalityPalnadu36Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Vinukonda MunicipalityPalnadu36Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Palakonda Nagar PanchayatParvathipuram Manyam28Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Parvathipuram MunicipalityParvathipuram Manyam36Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Salur MunicipalityParvathipuram Manyam32Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Addanki MunicipalityPrakasam32Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Chimakurthi MunicipalityPrakasam2873.64% The Hans India ↗Awaiting verified report
Darsi MunicipalityPrakasam28Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Ongole Municipal CorporationPrakasam62Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Atmakur Municipality (Nellore)Sri Potti Sreeramulu Nellore28Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Buchireddypalem MunicipalitySri Potti Sreeramulu Nellore28Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Nellore Municipal CorporationSri Potti Sreeramulu Nellore7240.91% The Hans India ↗Awaiting verified report
Dharmavaram MunicipalitySri Sathya Sai48Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Hindupur MunicipalitySri Sathya Sai52Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Kadiri MunicipalitySri Sathya Sai44Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Madakasira Nagar PanchayatSri Sathya Sai23Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Penukonda MunicipalitySri Sathya Sai23Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Puttaparthi MunicipalitySri Sathya Sai28Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Ichchapuram MunicipalitySrikakulam28Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Palasa-Kasibugga MunicipalitySrikakulam36Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Naidupeta MunicipalityTirupati3259.35% The Hans India ↗69.99% The Hindu report via BharatPulse ↗
Puttur MunicipalityTirupati3664.66% The Hans India ↗75.57% The Hindu report via BharatPulse ↗
Sullurpeta MunicipalityTirupati3253.37% The Hans India ↗63.72% The Hindu report via BharatPulse ↗
Tirupati Municipal CorporationTirupati6642.12% The Hans India ↗45.26% The Hindu report via BharatPulse ↗
Venkatagiri MunicipalityTirupati3654.77% The Hans India ↗67.04% The Hindu report via BharatPulse ↗
Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal CorporationVisakhapatnam12039.74% The Hans India ↗Awaiting verified report
Bobbili MunicipalityVizianagaram36Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Nellimarla Nagar PanchayatVizianagaram23Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Vizianagaram Municipal CorporationVizianagaram62Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Akividu Nagar PanchayatWest Godavari2861.94% The Hans India ↗Awaiting verified report
Narasapuram MunicipalityWest Godavari36Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Badvel MunicipalityY S R Kadapa40Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Jammalamadugu MunicipalityY S R Kadapa32Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Kadapa Municipal CorporationY S R Kadapa6641.21% The Hans India ↗Awaiting verified report
Kamalapuram Nagar PanchayatY S R Kadapa23Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Mydukur MunicipalityY S R Kadapa32Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Proddatur MunicipalityY S R Kadapa52Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Pulivendula MunicipalityY S R Kadapa40Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Rajampet MunicipalityY S R Kadapa32Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report
Yerraguntla MunicipalityY S R Kadapa28Awaiting verified reportAwaiting verified report

Reported district names can differ between news bulletins and the retained directory. Kanigiri is grouped under Markapuram here; a 3 PM report calls it Prakasam. Grouping is provisional and does not alter the source percentage. “Awaiting” means unverified in this edition, not zero.

Historical interim comparison

The Tirupati contrast.

30.31 pp

Puttur minus Tirupati Corporation

Interim snapshot, not final turnout. Around 5 PM, five reported body figures span 45.26%–75.57%. This is an intra-district contrast, not a statewide ranking.

District counts: 240,052 / 447,461 → 53.65%. Corporation counts: 131,476 / 290,492 → 45.26%. Subtracting matching counts gives the four other towns a combined 69.17% turnout, 23.91 points above the corporation.

Confidence: limited. Figures come from an inspected syndicated copy of The Hindu report, published 19:33 IST. Around-5-PM reports are not certified final totals. The Hindu report via BharatPulse ↗

Same approximate observation time · around 5 PM
Puttur75.57%
Naidupeta69.99%
Venkatagiri67.04%
Sullurpeta63.72%
Tirupati Corporation45.26%

Calculated from that report: the city represents 64.92% of electors and 54.77% of votes cast, a 10.15-point share gap. This does not reveal individual choices, motives or party support.

The denominator matters

Three totals. No forced reconciliation.

Published electorateScope / decisionEvidence
9,689,061Use only with 4,654,133 voters at 3 PM. Ratio 48.0349%, rounding to 48.03%.The Hans India ↗
≈9,935,000Closing report’s approximate roll. No matching final votes total; do not apply to the 3 PM numerator.IANS via Town Post ↗
10,345,127100-body compilation from earlier research. Excluded from turnout calculation; official scope reconciliation pending.Inspect compilation

Differences may concern notified versus polling bodies, eligible voting areas or revisions. Those are hypotheses, not established explanations. A source-issued scope crosswalk and matched polling-station totals are needed. We do not choose a denominator simply because it produces a preferred percentage.

Turnout momentum: +10.90 pp reported

37.13% at 1 PM → 48.03% at 3 PM. This is a cross-report difference. The 1 PM denominator is unstated, so cohort continuity is unconfirmed; a normalized participation rate per hour is withheld. No interpolation or final-turnout forecast is shown.

Deccan Chronicle ↗ · The Hans India ↗

GVMC: the count resolves the rounding choice

730,431 ÷ 1,837,901 = 39.7427%, supporting 39.74%. NTV reports 39.72%. We retain 39.74% with the count-based calculation and disclose the 0.02-point discrepancy.

The Hans India ↗ · NTV Telugu ↗
Competition before the count

The ballot has more than one story.

Unopposed seats

Corporations: 118 / 922 wards → 12.80%. Other urban bodies: 638 / 3,020 → 21.13%. The difference is 8.33 pp. These are calculations from reported aggregates, not independent certification of each declaration.

The New Indian Express ↗

Candidates per contested ward

Corporations: 3,077 / 804 → 3.83. Municipalities and nagar panchayats: 6,669 / 2,382 → 2.80. Density describes the reported field, not vote closeness. Local candidate lists remain accessible one contest at a time.

IANS via Town Post ↗

Reconciliation flag: the closing report states 10,262 candidates, but its components (153 + 367 + 3,077 + 6,669) sum to 10,266. We withhold a combined all-office candidate total until corrected. Candidate entries across offices are not necessarily distinct people.

Less obvious, still evidence-led

Patterns worth asking about.

01

A district average conceals local variation

Tirupati’s weighted district figure sits between very different body rates. Investigate documented access, electorate structure and timing before proposing causes.

02

Raw votes and turnout rates differ

More votes from one group may reflect a larger electorate. Gender comparisons require matched group denominators; an unmatched raw-vote count is not a gender turnout gap.

03

A crowded ballot can still be concentrated

Candidate density becomes more informative alongside effective candidate numbers, vote shares and victory margins. Those need results; they are not calculated before verified returns.

Neutral strategy research: what evidence would test it?

QuestionRequired evidenceWhat the pattern cannot prove
Did participation accelerate?Same-cohort, same-source interval countsA campaign caused the change
Why were seats unopposed?Complete final lists, withdrawals and declarationsCoercion, deals or misconduct
Did voters split their choices?Comparable mayoral and ward aggregate returnsHow any individual voted
The machinery of local democracy

Facts beyond the headline.

Two leadership channels

Akashvani describes direct mayor/chairperson elections and indirect deputy/vice-chairperson elections under the revised rules. Different offices need separate denominators.

Akashvani ↗

Surveillance is an arrangement

The SEC briefing reported approximately 12,000 CCTV cameras at 6,600 locations and 1,543 route vehicles. Deployment counts do not establish that wrongdoing occurred.

The New Indian Express ↗

Closing time is not final turnout

People already queuing at 5 PM could still vote. IANS reported final turnout would follow polling-station reconciliation. A report published at 8:11 PM can still describe the 3 PM snapshot.

IANS via Town Post ↗
Open methods & confidence

Know what each number can carry.

Reported · moderate
Accessible newsroom reporting; some state counts corroborated. Not a verified statutory return.
Syndicated · limited
Accessible reproduction attributed to another newsroom; the original could not be independently retrieved. Keep provisional.
Calculated
Reproducible arithmetic on cited inputs. Mathematical precision does not upgrade source confidence.
Unavailable
No verified observation in this edition. Never interpreted as zero, no contest or no incident.

Ranking safeguard: all 100 notified bodies do not have comparable closing reports here. Statewide highest/lowest turnout is therefore withheld. Partial reporting examples must not be presented as statewide winners or laggards.

Aggregation: turnout = Σ voters who voted ÷ Σ eligible electors × 100. A gap is measured in percentage points. Unopposed share uses all notified wards; candidate density uses contested wards. Never average municipal percentages or add ballots from different offices. Rounded inputs can affect the last decimal.

Coverage: 26 district directory groups / 26 in the retained cohort; 100 body identities / 100 notified; 3,942 ward directory entries / 3,942 reported. Turnout observations are measured separately. No complete ward-turnout dataset, independently inspected final return or verified results is claimed.

Corrections: retain source time, observation time, retrieval time, scope and denominator. A later report is a new snapshot; a correction must explain the changed input. No voter identifiers or private addresses are published. Statistical patterns do not establish intent, affiliation or wrongdoing.

Send a correction with a source document · Editorial standards

Open the source ledger Reports, verification attempts & corrections
Evidence ledger

Follow the sources.

  1. The New Indian Express ↗

    SEC briefing reported by a newsroom

    Published 2026-11-01T03:27:00+05:30 · edition reviewed 2 Nov 2026
  2. The Hans India ↗

    3 PM observation; publication was later

    Published 2026-11-01T17:15:00+05:30 · edition reviewed 2 Nov 2026
  3. NTV Telugu ↗

    Corroborates state counts; GVMC differs by 0.02 pp

    Published 2026-11-01T15:54:00+05:30 · edition reviewed 2 Nov 2026
  4. Deccan Chronicle ↗

    1 PM observation; denominator not stated

    Published 2026-11-01T15:06:00+05:30 · edition reviewed 2 Nov 2026
  5. IANS via Town Post ↗

    SEC closing briefing; final turnout still awaited

    Published 2026-11-01T20:11:00+05:30 · edition reviewed 2 Nov 2026
  6. The Hindu report via BharatPulse ↗

    Syndicated copy inspected; original not independently retrieved. Around 5 PM, not certified final

    Published 2026-11-01T19:33:00+05:30 · edition reviewed 2 Nov 2026
  7. Akashvani ↗

    Public broadcaster explanation of direct civic-chief elections

    Published 2026-09-06T15:10:00+05:30 · edition reviewed 2 Nov 2026
  8. The New Indian Express ↗

    Later reported statewide polling-day total; not a 3 PM snapshot

    Published 2026-11-02T05:08:00+05:30 · edition reviewed 2 Nov 2026
  9. The South First ↗

    Corroborates statewide counts; reports revised local figures and a different ward scope

    Published 2026-11-02T10:13:00+05:30 · edition reviewed 2 Nov 2026
Official-source verification attempts

The following SEC endpoints were unavailable during checks. These links identify authorities, not successfully inspected evidence. No official certification badge has been assigned.